-
Scarmoge posted an update 6 years ago
… it appears that the dropping of hints of an immanent “food shortage” has begun. The time has come …
Some suggested reading … Mikolajczyk, Stanislaw – the Preface to The R _ _ e of Poland
“The Western mind may find it hard to comprehend rule by a fanatic handful”, “.We fell … because we were sacrificed by our allies, …” and also The Collected Writings of Thomas Paine (both available gratis on archive.org).
At some point our so called “representatives” under the influence of their hubris (there is a connection to nemesis here as well) … After all “Whom the Gods would destroy they first make mad” (from Longfellow’s The Masque of Pandora) … as is evident by our “representatives” behavior.
… back to the subject at hand … at some point our “representatives’ will again appear in public to speak with their “constituents” when they do …Have on hand … just in case they require a prompt …
“The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.”
— U.S. Constitution, Article VI, Clause 3and
The oath prescribed in Title 5, Section 3331 of the United States Code.
“I, _______, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion, and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”
I plan on trying to have the following conversation:
Q: Mr. (in my case) ________________ . Is it true that upon entering office you took an oath to support and defend The Constitution?
A: Yes
Q: Would you please, here again, in public, reaffirm your oath to support and defend The Constitution?
A: Yes … (I can not imagine that he would say “NO”). … If he does say “No” I’ll be prepared to respond.
After asking why he is choosing not to do so and having a few minutes of discussion I can imagine being asked
why I am insisting on such a thing.My response … “Because Mr. ___________ it appears the time is soon coming when each of us will be asked to make a choice.
The choice will be between the Bunker and the Barricade. I am attempting to determine where YOU will be.Just a suggestion.
The Giza Forum (Legacy)
Closed Archive of The Old Forum