Activity

I’v e tracked her for years. She’s great. See her most recent about women who play around with powerful men. She slams mainstream feminists in many ways.

I watched until first CSPAN lecture where Paglia stated she was voting Clinton and voted for Clinton 94′- I then fired up second Paglia interview from Modern Times. Still watching very difficult but I’m letting it play while typing. Well, she speaks of the naivety of post -modernists neo -marxists but she is awfully wound up and seems naive herself or lacks perspective on context with all she is wound up about. No wonder . She is frightfully manic in her descriptions and could use less intellectual hype and focus on the heart of the matter. She could stand a reading of Miles Mathis dot com. A lunch with CA Fitts , Dr. JPF and focus on cause and effect. A lot of omission of actual facts and content in her position on power. Not quite hitting the nail on the head with views around power , it’s effects but good at signaling the spectacle of it. James Corbett’s “How big oil concoured the world” and “Why big oil conquered the world” would be useful primer for Paglia IMHO. She is either woefully ignorant or complicent in omission of facts on Clinton and co. th e nepharium. She watches too much reality tv. IMO. Clueless on entrainment, and social engineering.