-
DanaThomas posted an update 5 years, 10 months ago
German medical ruling. Some “debunking” sites have “nitpicked” but the substance remains.
https://www.preventdisease.com/news/17/012717_Biologist-Proves-Measles-Isnt-Virus-Wins-Supreme-Court-Case.shtml
The Giza Forum (Legacy)
Closed Archive of The Old Forum
All viruses next on the list, please!
I’ve been trying to understand viruses for some time. They’re not technically “alive” but they are “active”, it seems. From what “they” generally say, is that a virus is a DNA or RNA strand with proteins covering these nucleic acids; but I’ve also come across much literature that has stated that the process for obtaining, isolating, and purifying the nucleic acids wrapped in proteins is not all that efficient, and even that the process of implementing Koch’s postulates has the potential of altering the original viral specimen. I recently found a similar statement when studying the RT-PCR test that is used to supposedly identify the covid19 infection (even though the test inventor said it should never be used to diagnose infection, but that’s a whole other rant). So, viruses aren’t technically “alive”, and maybe we still don’t understand what it is that these little entities are, or how to specifically isolate and purify them, but something is happening. What exactly? I haven’t quite figured it out, that’s for sure. Yet to say that the thousands of virologists in the world are either misinformed, unlearned, or outright deceptive seems to be too far of a stretch, but something is afoot…
Your analysis has gone pretty much along the same lines as mine because of all the virology that has occurred, all the “conclusions” that have been made, but when I really think about it, I find it totally plausible that the story I heard in high school could be true. One of those stories about how the little guy could get the princess if he could NOT think of the Black Camel. Frankly, he couldn’t get it out of his head. Every time he saw her, he thought Black Camel. Since they have never been able to create a pure sample (a virologist admitted this to Jon Rappoport) then they keep seeing the same virus that everyone has said they saw.
Then there is the incredible amount of money to support the research so they can go on a vaccine crusade. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
If you were a member of Solari.com (and anyone who is a member here should save up dimes to be a member there as well – with the 2 website, you know more about the world than all the rest of the internet), you could listen to Dr. Thomas Cowan’s discussion with Catherine. It TOTALY explains why and, without hearing it until now, I nailed the exact answer. If you are a member, listen NOW.
If they don’t nail it to a virus, then all of manufacturers of the environmental toxins would be LIABLE. $$$$$ Insurance $$$$ Instead, treat the problem with a vaccine that has no liability. Problem solved.
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A VIRUS. GET THAT IN YOUR HEAD NOW. You will become a survivor with that knowledge.
BTW, Dr. Thomas Cowan decided it was easier to live his life than fight the AMA on the lies that they manifest. Again, with that knowledge, reconsider your health advisor. Their name plate might not end in an M.D. (If you don’t remember, BOTH of my parents had that title and my mother did the clinical studies on Benydrl while Dad worked for Sabin in medical school.)
Yeah, it is very “fruitful” to be a member of both Joseph and Catherine. Synergistically they are of the chart!
Gosh, the way viruses work looks like the typical globalist and lobbyist has duplicated their ways…
Because viruses are not cells, they can’t divide by binary fission like bacteria. Yet they do reproduce themselves in an extraordinary way. Their structure enables viruses to attack a plant or animal cell called a host cell. The protein shell protecting the virus’ DNA is covered with spikelike protrusions. These spikes allow the virus to latch onto the cells they infect. Once hooked on, the virus injects its genetic material into the host cell.
Here is the problem, Billy Bob. Those pictures of viruses are just that ARTIST’s pictures, not photographs. The electron micrography that we do have shows a virus looking EXACTLY like an exosome. Since we can’t actually see the process, we have theorized the process. What has always been analyzed is the RNA/DNA sequence as it is not alive but a fragment of genetic material coated in protein (often the same as the cell wall protein – which should be a hint). No study has EVER been able to isolate the specific strand but have studied the sequencing and when the majority of the sequencing is X, then it is determined the “virus” is X. When it is something else, they decide it is new and now it is Z or X19.
These weird pictures are the set-piece of current propaganda. During SARS the “bugs” were shown as being yellow, now they tend to be blue-green (a cue for the “green agenda”???
I suppose the virus thing is so easily maintained due to the general lack of knowledge (perhaps deliberate) of the general public of cellular biology. I had courses in biology in high school and college and all I recall is learning the nomenclature for cell parts and theory of evolution…I tried today to understand what an exosome is and walked away scratching my head. The best understanding I came up with was debris ejected out of the cell that can cause problems if allowed to stay in the body. It can also be used as a marker if cancer or other diseases are present. A virus per say does not exist.
They, exosomes, are common in our natural environment on earth. The body like plants and animals are designed to deal with them or we would have perished long ago.
I understand your frustration, Billy Bob. I took cellular biology as a master’s level course when the ability to start identifying all the parts of the genome and starting to label identifying genes. 1973. I was planning to go for a master’s in biology but got turned and switched to landscape architecture. (I was the one who did environmental impact analysis for the firms for which I worked.) I have been in science ever since and thought that I had been duped all these years was nearly impossible to wrap my head around. An exosome is a piece of RNA or DNA that is expressed out of a cell when the cell has been poisoned. This could be glyphosate, EMF radiation, or a host of possible environmental toxins. This piece of genetic material is a signal to other cells of this violation and is a way to signal for cell repair or simply a way to try to guard against the problem. When you are allergic to pollen, for example, cells signal to produce mucus to protect the lining of your nose and throat and as it builds up, you sneeze and out goes some of the toxin, in this case, an allergen. It is pretty simple.
So when you are exposed to a toxin, say 5G for example, that has a 92% oxygen absorption rate, meaning it robs your cells of oxygen, your cells go into hyper defensive mode sending out exosomes to signal for oxygen. If you tested the person for “virus”, you would find an excessive number of these exosomes that you have been told CAUSE the disease which, in fact, are indicating that the person has been poisoned. It is not the cause, it is the indicator.
The reason that virology research has continued with people staying on course is primarily MONEY. If the truth comes out that glyphosate, 5G or any other MANUFACTURED product causes illness, even death, then that segment is liable. Insurance costs become prohibitive. Instead, blame it on a virus, make people take vaccines that CAUSE illness, and voila. Sick population, no liability. Eugenics at its finest.
Thanks for the tutorial…So the detection of an exosome by the cell is an effort to save itself from a poison, whatever that may be. of a threat to a living healthy cell otherwise it will destroy the host if the immune system is overwhelmed…good God.