Activity

In legal terms, there is a huge difference between Man as thought of in the 18th century and the term Human Being. This is old yet uncommon knowledge that human being as a legal term is a bastardization of the definition of Man as a Godly creation and the legal system deriving from it. The term human being refers more to something that may resemble Man but is diminished in certain capacities and in this case, legal standing where a Man has recognized and has full legal standing where a human being does not.
Given modern robotics as it is know generally too people isn’t very well advanced and doesn’t seem like it would be viable as a replacement for human labor but it is undeniable that a push is being made nevertheless.
Joseph has posted a few stories about human parts being printed and other research being made in the trans-human field like connecting biological neurons to artificial ones and more importantly, having information protocols work through these different media.
I’m wondering if the “robots” that are incoming aren’t really more artificial or what is claimed to be artificial human beings. Artificial human beings would be legally in a very different class.
Corporate entities and research labs have been prevented from creating whole humans for themselves via artificial insemination and that is fairly well established and supported but even in these recent cases, you still have biological DNA from a mother and father and progeny is still very clear. If the technology progresses to where DNA is created in a lab and printed directly for and by a corporation, I believe it will become more difficult to identify these creations legally as Man, as the creation of God rather than property of the corporation in essence creating a fully owned and internally created slave race which has long been the goal. In this case, if the “robots” we are told are coming are less robots and more artificially created human beings, updating the tax code would certainly be necessary in order to identify an artificially created person that is property as opposed to a natural person who holds certain rights from its government.
Corporations hope that these artificial beings would not be accepted in order to create their slave race. Basically, is there a way for artificially created humans to come to God’s grace if they have no human progeny? And, if natural Man is to be forced out of its environmental niche as a universal fulcrum of perception, can artificial humans that have accepted God’s grace as it were and reject their property status fill that roll adequately?
@joseph