Activity

  • Laurent posted an update 5 years, 1 month ago

    Posted for Posterity
    It’s weird but this article reminds me a little of CERN’s signal processing. QEC (Quantum Error Correction) or acceptable predetermined parameter is fairly reminiscent of what I’ve heard of the signal processing of the sensors for the super collider where the output of the collider is first run through filters that alter the raw signal.
    Additionally, it seems that they are trying to virtualize hardware. At the beginning of the article, the author states that quantum computing has multiple orders of magnitude signal error rates compared to modern computing and QEC would solve this issue. In effect, to me it seems that as an electrical signal is modulated by smaller and smaller electrical components in modern computing, quantum computing essentially virtualizes the physical components into software and the physical barriers to Moore’s law becomes more malleable. Where this becomes important, especially for Google, is that if you have a large infrastructure such as the Google apparatus, you would be able to internally manipulate, create, combine, virtual purpose built computers on demand depending on the current requirements. This is pretty neat….

    Best quote of the article in my opinion is the last.
    “Still, a drive to practical outcomes might even lead us to totally abandon the abstract notion of fault-tolerant quantum computing and replace it with something more like fault-tolerant-enough quantum computing. That might be just what the doctor ordered.”

    MOney for nothing and the chicks for free. The word babble business is booming this year!

    • I may have had my fill of government funded and sponsored bottlenecks of fresh randomness.

      • The more information is digitalised and removed from the scrutiny of human consciousness, the more it will sink into chaos, pulling its devotees with it.

        • I hate to say it;
          but loved the “virtualize hardware” concept!
          Also, conversely; Dana’ reply, also nails it!

            • Ya, it’s an interesting way to get around Moore’s law. As I reread my comment, I really didn’t explain it well enough but the article that I was commenting on describes a process where the QEC takes a raw signal from the quantum hardware and modulates it as resistor, transistor and other physical components modulate an electrical signal in modern computers. This would in turn recreate a set of virtualized hardware that could be configured on demand as the task demands and when the task ends, the virtual hardware could just disappear to reform another process. It is an interesting concept but far removed from multi dimensional processing quantum computing is touted to be.

                • In theory.
                  But in practice?
                  That’s the rub between virtual and reality.
                  They’re not the same; yet they can virtually do the same things abstrctly.
                  That’s why I loved your concept!
                  And, perhaps there has been a proof of concept undertaken by them.
                  Like the experiments that shows the importance of the observer; there are unknown unknowns, far removed from the drawing boards.