-
Gabe posted an update 6 years ago
Over the last several years I have noticed that many of the posts in this forum are news articles. Although some of these articles can give hints in the pattern of behavior of the technocrats, these articles can sometimes become a distraction from conducting serious research or engaging in creative activity. Over the last several years I have refrained from posting news articles and only posted sources precisely for that reason. The lamestream media perpetuates negativity and fear to drive the agenda of the technocrats. Also, this negativity can be a distraction from spiritual development or reading primary texts. If we focused on posting sources for research or creativity in the forum rather than news, imagine what we could accomplish. Therefore, I respectfully request that from now on we focus on research and creativity rather than day to day events in the news in this forum. I am not saying that you cannot post news articles in this forum. However, I think that posting much fewer news articles and posting more sources would go a long way in helping us refocus our energies toward producing our own research and creative work.
The Giza Forum (Legacy)
Closed Archive of The Old Forum
By the way I’m glad this post was successful. Yesterday I tried posting this and I ran into a technical glitch that I described in my last post.
Given these tumultuous times I have appreciated the posting of news from the extraordinarily ‘diverse’ and discerning folks that are attracted to Giza. Other than a bit of an overdose of info about covid 19, I think we’re fine.
Again I am not saying that I am totally opposed to news articles. However, I think we need to focus more on research and the culture. @josephhFarrell @matthewlewist
“Owning the Culture”, in the best sort of way! Here, here, Gabe!
Good point, posting music or book links for example helps “raise the sights” to a broader dimension.
This is an ideal time for creative initiatives, in whatever sphere. Such work can have unexpected and favourable consequences.
What about this: putting down our own notes on the “Topological Metaphor” (at home and offline), each person will have a different starting point and thus a different contribution. Shall we give it, say, six months?
Good idea. For the members that are interested we could do this with other disciplines and a member could take the liberty to organize something like for a certain discipline. Then members could decide which projects they would like to participate in depending on their expertise and interest.