-
Cara posted an update 8 years, 8 months ago
This is interesting: archeo-acoustics.
http://www.ancient-origins.net/artifacts-other-artifacts/ancient-acoustic-artifacts-and-communication-gods-008592?nopaging=1
The Giza Forum (Legacy)
Closed Archive of The Old Forum
And here is the research paper mentioned towards the end of the article:
http://icrl.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Brain-Activity-And-Acoustic-Resonance.pdf
Its abstract:
“Previous archeoacoustic investigations of prehistoric, megalithic structures have identified acoustic resonances at frequencies of 95–120 Hz, particularly near 110–12 Hz, all representing pitches in the human vocal range. These chambers may have served as centers for social or spiritual events, and the resonances of the chamber cavities might have been intended to support human ritual chanting.We evaluated the possibility that tones at these frequencies might specifically affect regional brain activity. In a pilot project, 30 healthy adults listened to tones at 90, 100, 110, 120, and 130 Hz while brain activity was monitored with electroencephalography (EEG).Activity in the left temporal region was found to be significantly lower at 110 Hz than at other frequencies.Additionally, the pattern of asymmetric activity over the prefrontal cortex shifted from one of higher activity on the left at most frequencies to right- sided dominance at 110 Hz.These findings are compatible with relative deactivation of language centers and a shift in prefrontal activity that may be related to emotional processing.These intriguing pilot findings suggest that the acoustic properties of ancient structures may influence human brain function, and suggest that a wider study of these interactions should be undertaken.”
I absolutely agree. My example is much simpler (If Im off base let me know). Think of a person in the hospital w/ a heart problem. Say the patients heart beats too fast or too slow. I would like to place a kind of acoustic device on the chest that has a beat that is “normal” (80BPS?), the idea would be to use the idea of entrainment to try to get the patients heart back in a healthy range. I know what you wrote is much deeper than that, and I will let it “ruminate” for a while… ok? nice to meet ya!
Hi David, sadly, these are not my profound words, but the abstract of the research paper I linked to. I like your idea of using sound to synchronise with a heart beat.
Its all about resonance. https://snooze2awaken.wordpress.com/2014/01/22/orion-infrasound-pyramid-at-resonance/
http://sedonanomalies.weebly.com/schumann-resonance.html
https://phys.org/news/2016-08-acoustic-levitation-large-sphere.html
What are we made of?
https://water.usgs.gov/edu/propertyyou.html
Similar, this is a cymatic useage for moving ferrofluid. The chest attachable speaker would have to very (looking for the right word) quiet, almost or totally imperceptible to the patient. My reason for keeping it “quiet” from the patient is that it needs to be totally internalized and not have smearing by the patients mind. (However, the mind may be a good thing to include.) Im not sure exactly how to do it, but based on entrainment? Im sure it would work. I wish I had a Dr. who worked in Cardio in a hospital that could try it out.