Activity

Well, I was trying to make my comment as succinct as possible, so I should explain that I agree with you entirely. I do need to distinguish between the British people – of whom I am one – and the bankster elite that has been running Britain and much of the world since 1688. Even the present-day (usurper) Saxe-Coberg-Gotha Queen of Britain has to ask permission to enter the City of London on cermonial occasions. Such ostensibly quaint ‘historical’ customs both conceal and reveal the truth about who really governs the people of these islands. The City of London is home to the Bank of England; and the former is a ‘de facto’ state within a state. The Bank of England was established only after the Dutch Stadholder William of Orange cut a deal with banking interests in London to usurp the throne of these islands in order to establish a fractional reserve banking system here; i.e. the Bank of England that we have all come to know and love. England’s so-called ‘Glorious Revolution’ of 1688 was, in reality, a coup d’etat by the elites so as to pave the way for the mercantile hegemony and exploitation of indigenous peoples of most of the world in the following two centuries and more. (I include the indigenous peoples of these islands in the previous sentence).

If only the latter part of your statement were true Barbara!

I’ve just checked out Millner’s Kindergarten briefly from a bilderberg.org page that draws extensively on ‘Tragedy and Hope’- oh boy the hidden history of British imperialism! You may be interested also in my comment to Christian A, above. Somehow, although I allude there to a rather earlier period than the late Victoian, I can’t help but think that there may be some very tangible, if not positively genetic, connections between those who ruled the waves and the establishment of the Bank of England. I also suspect that the house of Saxe Coberg-Gotha and its German antecedents may have originated in Venice. Now there’s a thought!