Activity

Start with finding ‘The Anoited One’ and find out the name of the Messiah who came out of Egypt and led the Jewish rebellions in 55AD. Ask yourself why didnt Christians celebrate the birth of Christ until 350 years after he was supposdly born.
The tin mines in Cornwall were abandonned around 1100BC when the Bronze age came crashing to the ground for until this day.. not really well explained reasons..Global transport system transporting tin to smelters came from Albion where there were many tales of men of mighty stature. We killed the Baals (probably because they kept eating us..) Christianity is the whitewash pea soup ‘bouche-trou’ that people fall back onto because they’re still frightened for their eternal soul.

You might find him a bit blunt but you might be interested in Mark Passio, http://www.whatonearthishappening.com, especially his explanation of Natural Laws and his more controversial, Fake-Ass Christians. He makes a strong argument about the relationship between the occult, ancient pagan religions, and the development of Christianity, Islam, and Judaism. It has been pretty eye-opening to me and helps me fully appreciate the discussions on the occult here.

Hmmm, this is a very interesting question. I’m going to have to continue to read your posts to get a deeper sense of what abstracts you’re working with to continue your research. I’m very comfortable with observing abstracts since it hits the very essence of what it means to be a deconstructionist. I’m not familiar with Runes or maybe I am and it will sneak up on me in my own questing and I’ll look at the Runes one day and go, Oh. It’s interesting how questing has a way of abstracting information from the matrix, which leads to one answer or the next logical question and of course it turns out that there is a vocabulary present in the Runes, the Tarot, Astrology, Gematria, Alchemy, etc. that is by far more profoundly more simple than our questing. Today, I had the most interesting conversation with my secular Jewish friend, for example, about how the Jewish tradition emphasizes direct conversation with Hashem. I was raised American Senate Baptist (thank God not Missouri Senate) and we often joke that we’re going to write a book together called the Yenta and the Protestant. Anyway, the abstract I was interested in in this particular exchange was the emphasis in speaking to Hashem directly, a principle that was echoed in Martin Luther’s and John Calvin’s departure from the Catholic Church, as I was taught that the Protestants viewed Catholic Priest’s intermediary relationship between the devotee and God as unnecessary and the worship of Jesus’ mother and saints as idolatry and we are the ones who must speak with God ourselves on our own behalves as a show of our own devotion. Although the Jewish god is masculine, the culture is matriarchal. So between the Catholic Church and the Protestants, they split the difference relative to the Jewish model of worship. The Catholic Church maintained the divine feminine presence, but still held their figure heads out to be the intermediaries of their devotees’ relationship to God, meanwhile the Protestants made direct contact with God and had a ‘personal’ relationship with God, but further minimized the presence of the divine feminine in their practice. I could digress infinitum on such matters, but want to stay with the notion of the Christian posers maintaining an extraordinary amount of control over the behavior of converts, either through the supervision of the Priests through confession or the fanatic self-monitoring of fellow converts’ behavior in the Protestant camp, meanwhile claiming freedom to speak with God. If you’re going to convert people in order to multiply your numbers and consolidate your power as quickly as possible, you have to have one hell of a sales pitch. Meanwhile, in the Jewish camp, they don’t want converts, although if you’re a quester and so desire you are welcome to Hebrew out, but by virtue of being a child of a female Jewish woman, you’re Jewish. Even if you deny your faith, you’re still Jewish. No sales pitch required and while the normal angst of the culture is present, my experience has been that Jewish people have demands and expectations of their own, but they also provide the cultural support to meet those expectations. Where I came from, Huron South Dakota, there is an endless supply of mine fields designed to regulate morality, but have nothing to do with the aptitude of the individual. Aptitude is minimized in favor of not divorcing, not dancing, not having sex, not having pleasure, etc etc. I’m not responding directly to your post as much as I would like, but just want to share my flavor. Speaking directly to your conversation, I deeply appreciate the discussion of the 28 Runes and the 29th Rune being the sword itself. It makes me think of the argument of Ophicus being the 13th sign of the zodiac. It was a constellation that was actually trying to insert itself since 1970. But the actual 13th sign of the zodiac is the chart itself. In my humble opinion, for expedience sake, it’s a disinformation campaign designed to create confusion. The way it is described could encompass the position of the querent itself and attempting to tuck it in between Sagittarius (I would still be a Sag under the calculations) and Capricorn is a sneaky distraction to keep us looking outside not within. It’s like the political attempt to split Christians along the lines of how they pray by using the Jewish practices, without acknowledging the Jewish people really. There is an argument for 14 signs along with the Orphicus conversation. My sense is that hints at dimensional consciousness are being picked up in this argument, but those bound by Newtonian Physics explanations, which owns its own mysteries in itself, fails to explain it’s own boundaries adequately and a lot of reaching and fudging is going on to come up with an explanation for a phenomenon. Constructs can be explained based on the information we already know, but we don’t have sufficient constructs to explain what we don’t. I can’t give a true mathematical/philosophical argument for holding my positions with the 12 signs except that my gut is saying we’re not done comprehending just those signs. In an interesting interview on Dark Journalist, with Joseph Farrell, he had stated some version of how we could think about cosmology. We shouldn’t think about cosmology in terms of what we can manifest, but what has been manifested. Why? Because most of us don’t do the work relative to how we’re shaped and we’re trying to manifest something under conditions we don’t understand. I actually could fully make the argument about the 12 signs but I’m not trying to prove anything. I’m trying to understand something. I deeply appreciate your leanings towards the Runes and original Christianity. So, if my own musings from a completely different orientation helps us intersect, and it seems that is happening, it would be soooo rewarding. I’m probably going to embarrass myself a few times, but I hope that you stay with this.