Activity

Both CAF and Richard Dolan have announced that the federal government has now made it difficult, if not impossible, for cities to avoid the installation of 5g antennae. This is going to take everyone joining in together to get it stopped as planning departments are now handcuffed.

They implemented the “Exclusion 32” clause sometime back along w/Swiss RE…long before 5G was discussed. E32 goes into detail including cordless phones. You may get 2 hits on a search. The carriers are not indemnified. Liability has been shifted to the user of these devices & in the case of towers the property owner receiving their monthly stipend.

There is a man called Richard Alan Miller who talks about various “woo woo” topics. Regarding 5G he recently offered this speculation along “follow the money lines”: ” it is well known that 5G is highly dangerous, but their plan is to launch the installations anyway, where possible (it does NOT work well in damp climates), and then announce oh, you’re right, it’s too dangerous, we’ll have to replace it”. Which means that the usual suspects profit from the first installation, an operational period, the dismantling process and the installation of something “safer” to replace it. That makes four profit centres. Oh, and the use of unwilling human guinea pigs to collect “medical data” on radiation damage…

10 yrs ago when fighting against a second wifi tower in my neighborhood (on church property across the street from me) I turned up the research on its damaging health effects . . . and the legislation that specifically excluded health effects as reasons for permit denial. I distributed all that information and spoke before city council in public hearings against allowing the permit. In the end, after the second hearing, the permit was denied, ostensibly because the pastor of the church failed to appear to defend wanting it on church property, but I think the denial was strongly influenced by the studies on negative health effects. Fight ‘em if you can! The mobile carrier was furious!