-
Foglamp posted an update 6 years, 11 months ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=75bKZZotJCo&list=WL
According to Kevin Annett, he was recently illegally detained for two days by three unidentified plain-clothes operatives at the US-Canadian border who interrogated him about his views on the royal family. He was not allowed a lawyer. In Mar19, Robert David Steele allegedly threatened that “they’ would have Annett removed from the public sphere. More recently, Steele allegedly wrote to Dr Catherine Horton saying thet Annett “has a choice shut up or have his life turned inside out the choice is his.”
The Giza Forum (Legacy)
Closed Archive of The Old Forum
Though he has said some pretty interesting things over the years, it would be prudent to take some of his assertions with a grain of salt. Anyway, as in the case of Icke, Mr Annett’s views on the “dark underside” of the Anglosphere countries are no secret, much less to the “authorities” there.
Yes, discernment is so important and tricky. Westall seems to have some unspecified corroboration; but, if it is true that Steele is making threats and if it is true that Canadian immigration officials gave custody of Annett to unidentified persons against Annett’s will, then it would appear that some pretty powerful people also think that Annett has said some pretty interesting things, too!
When you are used to listening to people like Farrell and Fitts, you have to make allowances for the fact that most others – especially those who rely heavily on unnamed sources – do not always present such rigourous arguments.
When you’re poking where Annett is poking, self-preservation requires anonymity, I should have thought. Unless Annett does actually have psychological problems, it’s hard to understand why he would risk his life poking, unless there were something to poke. I would agree with Annett’s assessment that he appears to have hit a nerve. This is all the darkest of the dark.
Here’s the sauce. 😉
42:33 in. rds email @ 43:19
.youtube.com/watch?v=nivL6cOqj_w
Just my swag…I think the whole ITNJ thing is exploiting victims to discredit them. They have no jurisdiction. A dog n pony show. Add to that “Sacha Stone’s” daddy was a “Rottenfellar” feller, up to his eyeballs schmoozing w/UN mooks & it looks like a protection racket namely for randy Andy.
Sorta think it’s diversion from the Epstein control files.
A lot of players in this. There’s a lawsuit going on w/rds that sat idle for 2yrs. Not sure what Dave Acton’s role is, but until he filed as an intervenor in the rds lawsuit, my guess is it would have continued to stay idle. It could be massive censorship & the assigning of an internet ID…no more anonymity & damages for what a lot of folks post online.
ITCCS leads nowhere but Kevin Annett. Not any type of tribunal that I can find.
As it would with any lone nutcase – or any organization with good security.
Canadian citizens may be held for up to 48 hrs without charge. At that time the person must be charged or released immediately. One is allowed 1 phone call but the time of that call, within that 48 hr window, is at the discretion of the police/authority, and if no ones answers you’re on your own. “Miranda Rights” are an American right(?) not Canadian. Most Canadians do not know this…thank you Hollywood. Canadian authorities are also permitted to lie in the course of any investigation. As to authorities identifying themselves, I would assume that at some point in time they would have to, but it wouldn’t surprise me if that was at their discretion. Another mistake most Canadians make, is thinking that they can lay charges against someone else. This is wrong. One files a complaint and the police/authorities decide whether or not charges are laid. This info was given to me by a former rcmp officer. His advice to me was, if arrested, say nothing, take a nap, ignore any questions and make sure you have a phone number memorized of someone who has voicemail and will contact a lawyer for you.
Good advice, Bluenose. Thanks!