-
WalkingDead posted an update 6 years, 10 months ago
Let’s see who blinks first…
The Giza Forum (Legacy)
Closed Archive of The Old Forum
WalkingDead posted an update 6 years, 10 months ago
Let’s see who blinks first…
It seems to me that the US already blinked when Trump aborted the mission to retaliate for the loss of the drone. My gut tells me we are on the brink of The Great Reset. One faction of The Deep State wants to start a major war to trigger the reset. The other wants to push Deutsche Bank over the brink to trigger it. Either way, I think momentous events are only weeks away. The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation is not going to blink.
I think he pivoted to cyber warfare.
It didn’t look/feel like a pivot to me. When you’re managing complex, high-stakes military operations, you don’t do what Trump claims to have done. More like a panicked reaction to something unexpected; but it could have been any number of things, bluffs, feints, ruses and I wasn’t there; so, as always, your guess is as good, if not better, than mine!
I don’t think the US has the hardware or, frankly, the training to launch a kinetic conventional war. As I read the tea leaves as they lay currently, I give it 2-4 years. This next war will be for all the marbles. TPTB, aren’t stupid, and won’t take a loss lightly. Perhaps this is why the stollen money went off planet. The ultimate high ground was always something sought after.
When it comes to major conflict, as opposed to a relatively minor regional or local affair, I’m not sure that a kinetic conventional war is still on the menu. These days, you disable/immobilize an opponent by attacking his data/digital assets. The conventional (and even nuclear/hypersonic/DEW) kinetics probably have more of a ritual aspect than ever now. The attack aborted on Thursday night would have been more of a ritual than anything else; but, in the Iranian matrix, they clearly have a different liturgy and are not willing to take part. (BTW, if there’s a Christmas cake fund, we have to get it back!!)
Excuse the shotty reply, it’s via my phone at an airport.
I hadn’t considered the ritualistic aspect of a big war, but see your point.
If we agree that D.C. politics are dictated via multinational corporations at surface depth and arguably ancient bloodlines and/or a certain extraterritorial actor at depth, America my not have a choice. Assuming both of those potential parties possess exotic technologies that would make John Bolton’s mustache curl, the USSA may have a proverbial gun to her head. In other words, if “they” want a war, they’ll get their war one way or another. I’m more or less spitballing here, but a 3rd party with considerable funds, could engineer enough false flags to start their war. Especially if they control the narrative via their media.
One things for sure, America’s global dominance is being challenged all over the board. Is this by design? I think given the pension funds, the missing trillions, an artificial economy, crumbling infrastructure and a dumpster fire of an educational system, a controlled demolition of the state and “rape of Russia” follow up might be the perfect way to get away with the heist of the century.
I completely agree with you. I think it is by design; but, as usual, there is more than one group with hands on the various levers of power and they’re not all pulling in the same direction at the same time. They impose divide-and-conquer on us because that is what they know themselves. My hope and belief is that human consciousness has risen by now to an extent sufficient that enough of us can see through the FFs as and when they happen, and refuse to invest our energy in their evil. Safe travels, Ronin.
Perhaps this is the key phrase in the article: “As much as 30% of the world’s oil supply transits the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz. Wily Persian Gulf traders – who know better – are virtually unanimous; if Tehran was really responsible for the Gulf of Oman tanker incident, oil prices would be going through the roof by now. They aren’t.”
Rich conversation. Thanks guys.