Activity

I’m glad there are some environmentalists ( as evidenced by the article ) that aren’t co-opted by the globalist agenda, though the very term “environmentalism” gives me pause because of its implicit anti-human stance; is “environmental stewardship” an improvement, perhaps less fervently ideological? I would say so, since “stewardship” acknowledges the positive ( indeed, *theological* ) role of human beings rather than an excoriation of our presence on the earth. Also, any movement that constantly refers to a “crisis” sets off alarm bells; surely “crisis” is a key element in the elite social engineering playbook ( the infamous “problem/reaction/solution” paradigm ).