Activity

  • Rick H posted an update 6 years ago

    I sent this in a private email to Joseph Farrell but I will re-post this email here, because of the links and information in it.

    Part One:

    Hi, Joseph. On your recent podcast News and Views on youtube, you mentioned you had questions about the source of the article about Xi’s plans for conquest using biological weapons. Immediately upon digging into this, some red flags went up for me.

    I tracked its origin to Epoch Times, written by one J.R. Nyquist. A google search on Nyquist yields the fact that he writes for WND, “World Net Daily,” a magazine owned by Joseph Farah, an important member of the highly secretive Council For National Policy (CNP) a kind of Council of Foreign Relations of the American Right. Their members seem to have a lot of ties to Russian oligarchs of a right wing faction in Russia against Communism. Josh Reeves, an other researcher I follow on Internet, treats Russia not as a monolithic entity but as a entity ruled by two factions, one left wing and tied to the old Communist era and the other a Right Wing faction including Gavril yushvev. He says this right wing side backs Russia Today and Trump and tends to support right wing causes while the left side backs people like Vladislov Doronin, who built Naomi Campbell’s mansions, and who has ties to the Clintons and Epstein, et al. That, our culture war itself may in fact be an extension of this internal, Russian civil war between two opposing mafia oligarchical camps.

    Anyway, back to JR Nyquist, this Google search yields tons of anticommunist articles and then I discovered that he has a Youtube channel in which he interviews Victor and Marina Kalashnikov, who, apparently, made the news in Germany for being poisoned and were highly critical of the Kremlin’s communist side.

    Given that Josh, on his recent podcast, suspects RUSSIA, rather than China, as being the originator of the more deadly strain of coronavirus in Italy, and given that J.R, Nyquist is talking with right wing Russians, this article smells like a diversion to me, to get american patriots and researchers to look in the wrong direction. That is my high octane speculation for the day. See you on the flip side.

    -Rick

    • Ronin replied 6 years ago

      Most interesting. Thanks you.

      Epoch Times always throws a red flag with me.

      • Thank you. Yes, I was worried that viewers may get the impression that there may be a Liberal slant to my package of information and links, being that I provided a link to Huffington Post and all. But understanding the character of war in the 21st century … I was meditating on this today… it no longer becomes accurate to speak of Nations and States as entities in and of themselves but as platforms from which power groups operate. Whereas in 1944, it may have been simple: You join and enlist in the United States Army to go to “fight the Japanese” or “Fight the Germans,” today you would enlist in the United States Army to join a “peacekeeping and humanitarian operation” somewhere where there is fighting on the ground between various opposing four letter acronyms, be it FARC or EZLN or The Free Syrian Army vs ISIS or whatever. Non-state actors. And you’re supposed to act like a non-partisan player, “just trying to restore order and the peace” but what faction you will be nicer to will depend on which faction of oligarchs are in power. So if the Clintons are in power than you will be told to be somewhat partial to ______ insert what ever four letter fighter acronym the Clintons favor, whereas if the Republicans are in power you might then be told to be partial to this other _____ acronym that opposed them because they served the interests of whatever oligarchs that back the Republicans. So, whenever you are trying to investigate “who’s behind what” all the information and dirt that will come out on them will come from the opposing side, rarely on the same side (unless there are oligarchical factions splitting one of the parties as we see currently happening in both the Democratic and Republican parties). So, even though I post those links and they DO tend to have the Liberal slant, I want to reassure that I also take the Liberal side and what they say with a grain of salt, just as I would with the Conservative side. Though some of my personal beliefs may be considered “Liberal” or “Left wing” on some issues, I also understand that every ideology is weaponized and utilized to serve mountains of interests topped by citadels of ruling oligarchs, so practically every ideology that has started out as good or with good intentions has become so twisted and warped. For example, how did Feminism go from “we must liberate women to have the same opportunities as men” to “we must convict men suspected of rape on hearsay alone” or “we must ruin someone’s career just because they made an off-color comment four years ago on their blog that we (the self-appointed Inquisitors) deem to have been in support of rape culture?” Or, worse, some minor excuse or apology for SOMEONE ELSE who has been accused of endorsing rape culture (like for example defending someone who said on Twitter that its good for women to carry mace and be prepared for defending themselves when going into a particular neighborhood. And then the post goes viral and the individual gets maligned as a “supporter of rape culture” because of how what he or she said got interpreted by a mob of Twitter activists. And then when YOU go to defend him or her, citing examples in his or her record where he or she supported Women’s Empowerment, it doesn’t matter. He or she said something off color and “Why are YOU defending him or her?” and then it becomes: “YOU are a supporter of rape culture!”) Things get twisted and warped out of proportion and spiral out of control and soon everyone gets scared. Or they go and join an opposing side that is equally warped if not more warped, like some radical men’s movement, for example. Which may be backed by some other power player trying to accomplish his ends in this Grand Chess Board of the world.

        Or the Christian message for example: How did “turning the other cheek” and “blessed are the peacemakers for they will know God” become “we must don knight armor and go off and kill Muslims in the Holy Land” and “we must burn at the stake anyone on mere suspicion of being a witch” because someone had been unfortunate enough to eat some bread infected with LSA-laced bread mold. Philosophies that start off noble and good get degraded and twisted and warped into authoritarian and tyrannical regimes when utilized in the hands of vested interests and oligarchs. War becomes a big chess game of power players within nations. It no longer becomes accurate to say “The Russians” or “The Chinese” but, rather, which FACTION of the Chinese power system? We must be vigilant and investigative and start thinking of named individuals rather than thinking in terms of nations at war with each other.,