-
Mark Sean de Cantual posted an update 5 years, 10 months ago
So as we come out of COVID19 … does anyone know of any international comparison of the “Covid Curves” which has been normalised for comparison e.g. rather than using absolute values but using say the per centage of population over time (say weekly even) who were Tested, tested as Covid negative, tested as Covid 19 positive but asymptomatic, Covid positive and became ill, hospitalised, ICU treated and those who sadly passed?
The Giza Forum (Legacy)
Closed Archive of The Old Forum
The only problem is all the unreliable data floating around. Who would you feel is accountable? Consistent from country to country? Test used in the USA itself is deemed 80% inaccurate.
The only reliable data set you are going to find is in countries that did not “lock down” and gave financial incentive to code their sick and dying as swamp fever. I think Sweden is probably the best case for that.
On my fb page I try to provide a mini “service” on how things are going mostly in Italy, since the data provided by the National Health Institute (Istituto Superiore di Sanità) seems at least partly reliable. 1) As for the “infection” issue, we have to distinguish between persons with a clinical manifestation under way (i.e. evidently ill) and the others. Swab tests are said to be 80% unreliable at the first go and, they say, have to be repeated to “confirm”. Then there is serological testing, i.e. blood analysis to find “antibodies” to the “vuyruss” (who is to say if it is really THAT vuyruss at all??). All medical experts will say that the “serological positive” results have no clinical value, merely showing that the person has, perhaps, come into contact with the “vuyruss” and developed “antibodies” to it. So when the news says there is an “outbreak”, look for an explanation how this is actually defined or identified.
Then of course there is the “statistics op”. In the case of Italy, the deaths alleged to be “due to” the “vuyruss” are said to be 33,000. As early as March, official figures from the ISS identified 90% of those as being over 70. Now the ISS is slowly analysing the clinical records of all of those patients, and it is being consistently shown that about 90% of the patients had one or more life-threatening condition, though it is not clear why they were registered as dying from “the thing”. That leave 10% of 33,000, i.e. 3,300 said to have died “only” due to “the thing”. This is in a country where in a “normal” year, despite (or because of ?) vaccinations, 12 to 15 thousand have influenza as the recorded cause of death.
Sorry to go on so long, but just to repeat some early postings: a new serological study (see above) suggests that at least 1/3 of the population (i.e. 20 million!) have come into contact with “the thing” over the past 6 months without any consequences at all. If this is true in other countries, that means that the actual morbidity and mortality rate due to “the thing” is pitifully low, even accepting, as some here do not, the standard model of “vuyruss” induced illness.