-
erik2014 posted an update 5 years, 6 months ago
WATCH: Dr David Nabarro, the WHO’s Special Envoy on Covid-19, tells Andrew Neil: ‘We really do appeal to all world leaders: stop using lockdown as your primary control method’.
https://twitter.com/spectator/status/1314573157827858434
The Giza Forum (Legacy)
Closed Archive of The Old Forum
It’s interesting to see “WHO” coming around to this narrative that lockdowns make the poor a whole lot poorer. So now wondering who they will shift blame on for enforced lockdowns.
Also, Ely Lilly came out today and said that Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer kill way more people that C19 and that has always been the case but the Media locked on Covid and in their words, they have not done enough to educate the public on what they are doing for other diseases that are perhaps more deadly. It was an interesting Interview, you can see it here where it appears that Big Pharma is pushing a bit to walk back the insanity and participate with the population, filling the gap for those who are not buying the need for a vacs.
I was wondering which big cabal would be the first mover to create a more cooperative narrative and start getting businesses back open again. I mean, they can’t let the technocrats and Bezos scoop up all the money by those who are still employed and working from home. No time for going to the doctors when you work round the clock on your lap top. They’ve got to get people out circulating again in order to harvest their earnings.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2020-10-13/eli-lilly-ceo-says-virus-will-be-endemic-video
They are also saying that it’s an Endemic now vs Pandemic.
A few speculations come to mind on this…
– “Endemic” being used to push the idea “CV19 is here to stay” = “the new (ab)normal is here to stay.”
– Walking back on lockdowns could be a “good cop, bad cop” ploy, to take heat off the WHO and place the blame on individual governments. I don’t believe for a second that the WHO is opposed to lockdowns.
– If the media is coming out with the truth that other diseases kill far more than CV19, then I suspect a nefarious people, not goodwill. I believe the medium-term plan is to have everybody’s vital signs (heart rate, breathing, etc.) and blood levels of everything monitored 24/7 in real time. So a story like this could be spun as: “Yes, heart disease kills even more people than Covid. Governments around the world are taking the steps we need to take to get Covid under control. It’s time we started taking more aggressive steps to keep other killer diseases (heart disease, diabetes, etc.) under control. We’re going to develop tech and systems to monitor everybody’s heart rate and blood sugar…”
– IMO, none of the big players behind the CV19 psyop want the economy to get back to normal now, or ever. I think one of the main goals of scamdemic response is to permanently obliterate as many small and medium-sized business as possible; and another is to create a major constituency for a universal basic income (millions of homeless, hungry people).
I don’t believe for a minute that the WHO is opposed to lockdowns. Their walk-back could be a “good cop, bad cop” ploy: blame governments for the lockdowns to deflect criticism from the WHO, when in fact both the WHO and governments were complicit in locking society down.
I’m also not sure anyone in the money cabals wants any businesses other than their own to open up. I think one of the main goals of the CV19 scamdemic is to permanently destroy as many small and medium-sized business as possible, in order to steal business from them, buy up abandoned commercial property for pennies on the dollar, and create a strong public demand for a universal basic income by impoverishing millions of people.
The switch to “endemic” is probably meant to psychologically condition people to accept that CV19 and the “new (ab)normal” of tyranny, tracking, tracing, etc., are here to stay, forever.