-
DanaThomas posted an update 5 years, 6 months ago
Angkor Wat – how was it built? When examined, the standard theory involving hammers, chisels and elephants dragging stone from the quarry 50 miles away is much like the one used to explain the pyramids.
The Giza Forum (Legacy)
Closed Archive of The Old Forum
Cambodian pyramid looks like some kind of ancient technology
Hmm, a crystal in a pyramid… I’m sure I’ve read about that somewhere before…
Ever heard/read Graham Hancock on the “astro-archeology” of Angkor Wat and its putative relationship to the pole star, Draco, and Giza? Not sure if those hypotheses have withstood critique, but his analysis of the astrological/astronomical correlations of Angkor were fascinating.
Even more fascinating is Carl Munck’s analysis of its placement on the “world grid”… his work is sadly unknown and neglected.
Cambodian pyramids and Indian temples, with their faceting and levels, suggest hyperdimensional machines as in Munck. I discovered this Indian YT channel that came up “by chance” as I was looking at Indian temple festivals. Very occasionally the algos show something of significance. I Recomend Mohans short series on the Koh Ker pyramid temple that besides the missing central crystal is still surrounded by hundreds of stone “lingams” (pointed cylinders). It should be easy to find out what kind of rock it is and make some hypotheses.
I recently listened to Joe Rogan’s interview with Graham
Hancock and Brian Muraresku, it was supurb!
Muraresku’s book sounds well worth reading. It’s great to find that young people are studying Sanskrit and Classical Greek.
Yep that place is mathematical from top to bottom and oh how main stream quackademia keep the BS coming.
On his channel, Mohan has some very interesting material indeed, and his approach takes into account “modern science” and ancient Hindu tradition.
Not to mention how did they fashion and construct such complex to begin with… quackademia for sure.