-
Katie B posted an update 5 years, 5 months ago
The Common Law movement is gaining some traction – if interested, go to this website and play the video in the top right hand corner. It won’t let me share.
https://www.we-the-people.co.uk/?fbclid=IwAR2GWdps2Y_2nyRpeGoIfb3gSozOYXRaFRsby6CymU_UsD9VJzCyVPke4K4
The Giza Forum (Legacy)
Closed Archive of The Old Forum
Because it is WORKING. CAF is a skeptic but I think if we can start showing her that this is real, that it works to rid us of these fraudulent slave holders, she could be on board to promote the movement.
I need to do some research into the whole issue to see if it is viable. Time is also well spent on researching these frauds and then publishing it. It’s all CCP money at the end of the day, even behind the WEF. And I think this is what Putin was alluding to in his speech. Would be good if she could promote. Anway, common law is still the basis of the law of many countries so it cannot be completely dismissed. But they are trying to implement these new guidelines (if people comply they can be considered a precedent or silence is acquiesence so at the very least we need to resist) to usurp the laws of the land so it makes logical sense to use CL as a tool because it has a basis in reality and history.
If you do, please share your conclusions…
@Justa P.s. this chap is getting excellent results by using Common Law to prosecute fraudalent mortgage companies. He’s now taking every MP to court for fraud over cofib:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vk9-CLZplqA
I’m not sure if I’m skeptical or not, but I’m going to keep an eye on any and all types of legal challenges to today’s despotism. The biggest question I have is, what do you do when the courts ignore the law and the state sends a SWAT team to your house? CAF is right that, in the end, it comes down to force. I don’t think any citizens, armed or not, stand a chance against a SWAT team or army. BUT if millions of people refuse to comply, the control system can be overwhelmed. Also, one bee sting (like one legal challenge) is a nuisance, but a thousand at once can kill you.
Also, CL has more effect in the UK and other commonwealth countries by the very fact we have a monarch. As the monarch borrows sovereignty from the people and thus, if the laws of land have been usurped then that is treason.
As more ordinary people turn their attention to the law, the “awareness effect” will awake that otherwise slothful giant. This is happening in European countries (statute rather than common law, though case law has a role). The rule by decrees, orders and such like, by whomever issued, is being challenged as patently contrary to national constitutions. Moreover, the law has a hierarchy of validity, so that national or local orders issued with the excuse of an “emergency” are overridden by statute law and ultimately constitutional law. This also applies to the UK which actually does have a constitution but one contained in many volumes and not a single succinct document. 🙂
Check out the other vid with Devlin interviewing Bernicia. He’s been using Common Law with success. As it is a foundation Law for many commonwealth countries there absolutely cannot just dismiss it. I’m aware of the constitution but like you say it’s fragmented and needs the rubber stamp of top barristers from the city. Which Bernicia claims he is getting help from. For countries without guns this may remain our only hope. Even if the cabal & ccp back off this time we need to act swiftly and ensure these laws are elevated to stop further takeovers by foreign governments
… “I am interested in the Panama Canal because I started it. If I had followed traditional, conservative methods, I should have submitted a dignified state paper of probably two hundred pages to Congress, and the debate would have been going on yet. But I took the Canal Zone, and let Congress debate, and while the debate goes on, the Canal does also!”
T. Roosevelt from a speech at The University of California (1911)
… Ἄκουε δή, ἦ δ᾽ ὅς. φημὶ γὰρ ἐγὼ εἶναι τὸ δίκαιον οὐκ ἄλλο τι ἢ τὸ τοῦ κρείττονος συμφέρον. Listen—I say that justice is nothing other than the advantage of the stronger. … οὕτως, ὦ Σώκρατες, καὶ ἰσχυρότερον καὶ ἐλευθεριώτερον καὶ δεσποτικώτερον ἀδικία δικαιοσύνης ἐστὶν ἱκανῶς γιγνομένη, καὶ ὅπερ ἐξ ἀρχῆς ἔλεγον, τὸ μὲν τοῦ κρείττονος συμφέρον τὸ δίκαιον τυγχάνει ὄν, τὸ δ᾽ ἄδικον ἑαυτῷ λυσιτελοῦν τε καὶ συμφέρον. Thus, Socrates, injustice on a sufficiently large scale is a stronger, freer, and a more masterful thing than justice, and, as I said in the beginning, it is the advantage of the stronger that is the just, while the unjust is what profits man’s self and is for his advantage.
Thrasymachus – Republic (338 and 344 c)
I paraphrase Leo Strauss’ question (regardless what one thinks of Strauss) that arose from his thoughts about Thrasymachus because it is still one very much worth contemplating: “Is philosophy (in the Socratic sense) still protected in the city?”
We have seen lots of cyclical ups and downs since Socrates was lamenting the quality of the πόλις and its citizens!
I’m not sure where else you are going to find top Barristers, other than the City of London? That’s where they live contrary to popular opinion the city isn’t the domain of bankers, it’s the domain of law. The roots go deeper there than people imagine – layers upon layers. I haven’t much use for Greek philosophers but I do Druidic-Christian tenants that gave rise to our legal systems. The real bedrock of Common Law. The Truth Against the World . Or from the Triads of Paul the Apostle: “There are three sorts of men: The man of God, who renders good for evil; the man of men, who renders good for good and evil for evil; and the man of the devil, who renders evil for good”.