Activity

I was just doing some casual reading on this fine Saturday evening on the Mayflower compact, as one does. I was particularly researching the legal standing of “strangers” in the primordial American state and was happy to find the Mayflower Compact. Needless to say however, I was shocked when I saw a depiction of this event and thought I saw it somewhere else.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mayflower_Compact#/media/File:The_Mayflower_Compact_1620_cph.3g07155.jpg

The more recent event is from 2018 when Trump was at the G7 meeting in Quebec, Canada.

In the following will be the picture in question
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-44430000

As it was, the Mayflower compact was written to satisfy the reality of events as the settlers were far off of their land grant by the Virginia Co. The compact was written in order to satisfy the ship’s crew and the pilgrims who were now in the wilderness of America.

The first thing that I find curious is that from a certain point of view, this document is still very much in effect and may explain very well why certain families on the eastern seaboard have inordinate control over the US and a fondness for the UK and its apparatus.

Secondly, if the depictions of these two events are to indicate that they are related in some fashion as a subtle communication for those that can see, what do these events have in common?
In the case of the Mayflower Compact, the document was drawn to solidify the legal position upon reaching land which they had no right to legally and lawfully, and the situation required a bond for its members. In the second, Trump having pulled out of the Paris Accord, the “communique” was to reenter the US into a compact of mutual adhesion to the Globalist plan. It was not about steel tariffs just as the civil war was not about slavery.

God Spede.