Activity

  • Billy Bob posted an update 5 years, 1 month ago

    Found this interesting comment regarding the family as a necessity of fascism…..
    The family is the agent to which capitalist production delegates the psychological repression of the desires of the child.[36] Psychological repression is distinguished from social oppression insofar as it works unconsciously.[37] Through it, Deleuze and Guattari argue, parents transmit their angst and irrational fears to their child and bind the child’s sexual desires to feelings of shame and guilt. Psychological repression is strongly linked with social oppression, which levers on it. It is thanks to psychological repression that individuals are transformed into docile servants of social repression who come to desire self-repression and who accept a miserable life as employees for capitalism.[38] A capitalist society needs a powerful tool to counteract the explosive force of desire, which has the potential to threaten its structures of exploitation, servitude, and hierarchy; the nuclear family is precisely the powerful tool able to counteract those forces.[39]

    The action of the family not only performs a psychological repression of desire, but it disfigures it, giving rise to a consequent neurotic desire, the perversion of incestuous drives and desiring self-repression.[39] The Oedipus complex arises from this double operation: “It is in one and the same movement that the repressive social production is replaced by the repressing family, and that the latter offers a displaced image of desiring-production that represents the repressed as incestuous familial drives.”[37]

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Oedipus

    • Luke 14:26
      As all in the KJV, this has meanings on several layers..

        • As discussed on today’s vid chat, ideas and words are and can be used to convey and control the thinking processes to corrupt any institution.

        • Sounds like Freud applied to Marxism. IMO, the former is claptrap, and the latter not much better. (Not that capitalism can’t have problems.) Reminds me of critical social justice theory.

            • That is Correct answer. The book I am reading, Barbarism with a Human Face by Bernard-Henri Levy, published in 1977, requires a knowledgeable background in French left political history of the era. Needless to say I’ve been busy finding out, and boy what a can of worms I’m finding. The book pretty much predicted where we’d be now. Fascism and communism are after our soul which is required for the totalitarian state to exist. Levy is my first pass at studying nominalism. Makes for a very bleak world if Klaus and gang pull it off.

                • Ah, good old “BHL,” as he’s commonly known in France… Famous for his incessant media appearances and diatribes. (I get the impression he’s about as loved in France as Herr Schwab is everywhere.) I’ve never read him. But I think he rubs elbows with the movers and shakers, so I’m not surprised if his predictions have come to pass.

                    • The May 68 riots in France reference required a quick research dive to see what that was and took me down a few rabbit holes I was not aware. Dr. Scarmoge mentioned the book awhile back. I’ve not been exposed to left intellectual ideas and actions except in my own country. Marcuse in college was about it.

                      • … and as far as I know FiatLux he is the only philosopher to have appeared in Vogue magazine in the 1970’s. As best I can recall the photo was of him in an open white dress shirt with his long locks blowing freely in the studio fan provided breeze, a real Fabioesque bodice ripper (apologies to anyone offended by my use of the term “bodice ripper” or of the name “Fabio”) type photo. How do I know this you ask … Graduate Philosophy TA lounges can be very, very boring, dull places and on occasion photos inviting commentary would appear on bulletin boards to help break the oppressive analytic atmosphere.

                          • “Vogue magazine” and “philosopher” in the same sentence is enough to lighten the atmosphere for me! You should see him on air, in more recent times, in his comb-over, ranting and gesticulating like a madman…

                        • … unfortunately BillyBob the history of philosophy bears out that we have been living in the bleak Nominalist World since the 14th Century or so. It’s interesting that a seemingly unintended consequence of digital technology is that as it penetrates more and more of our materiality it has the effect of dissolving the illusory reality of the Nominalism that has been the luminiferous aether of humanity for the last 600 years or so … for a popular account of the effects of Nominalism see Richard Weaver’s – Ideas Have Consequences, Univ. of Chicago Press, 1948.