Activity

  • DanaThomas posted an update 4 years, 10 months ago

    I think others have said this but the Dr. Fausti email release looks like a psy-op, at least with regard to the spin that “China made the virus”; an assertion that ignores the fact that it has not been shown that ANYBODY can “make” that glob of proteins going under the name of “virus”. Virology is largely a fraudulent science. When you dig into the papers on the “artificial virus” all you actually get is computer-generated genome models, and nobody has been able to prove that such substances have been isolated in accordance with the rules set down by biology. What is more, if such “weaponized virus” techniques actually existed and had been put into practice by a jolly group of scientists and bureaucrats, the latter would have probably long shared the fate of those “disappeared” scientists in Britain some years ago. The “China made the virus” meme, spreading in the so-called alt-media, can paradoxically be used to justify lockdowns, jabs and so on, apart from the geopolitical shenanigans. On the bright side, the scientific community might start backtracking, to recover a modicum of credibility (I’m using a delicate expression here) to avoid the inevitable blowback. This will accelerate in the likely event that the fake science funding mechanism breaks down, together with the secrecy protecting it.

    • Anyone that is a subscriber to Solari can watch Ulrike Granögger future science series and frankly should. I think you are right Dana.
      On a sidenote Dana, do you ever sleep?

      • Bigger lies to cover bigger lies….makes sense to me. When someone is amoral nothing sticks and anything goes.

        • I wonder if they sprung this psyop partly as a response to China taking a hard line with the U.S. at the recent summit meeting in Alaska.

          A curious thing about this psyop: Won’t it get a few more “normies” to stop blindly trusting the government and so-called experts? That could be a positive side effect.

            • It’s to activate the T-rumpers (“the folks with the guns”), cause remember, he’s the one that seeded the story at the beginning. The idea is to divide and conquer. I agree that virology is a scam. If you have to mix the isolant with bovine syrum and monkey kidney to satisfy your result, it sounds more like a magic poultice. Unfortunately, but not surprisingly, we’re paying people (all over the planet) to try to kill us with their magic potions. “For Science”

            • How can one argue that viruses are not “real” while at the same time bring up “Koch’s postulates”? Now, that may not be what you’re exactly arguing here, but it has the familiar tone that is recently so frequent here on Giza regarding this hypothesis. If viruses aren’t real then what was Koch attempting to isolate? I think the problem isn’t that viruses don’t exist, it’s more that we simply don’t understand those “things” that we call “viruses”. Welcome to complex systems. Obviously, Man can make something in the form of a “glob of proteins” that does make people sick (e.g., gain of function research)— we are in a pandemic after all, and a few million people have died, supposedly, but maybe that’s all a fraud, too? At this rate life won’t really be “real” when we’re done with it. The idea that viruses aren’t “real” seems utterly ridiculous in a general, evolutionary context. It reminds me of the flat earth argument. With all the thousands of pilots (insert virologists) out there you’d think someone would have spotted it and the discovery would have spread, well, like a virus. For this to be so, one would have to argue that the entire field of virology (and aviation) is corrupt, but that seems a bit too ludicrously overarching from my perspective. I’d be more willing to say that we don’t know all that much about those “things” that we call proteins and amino acids, but that’s about as far as I’d go (I’ve seen the videos posted here on this topic, I’ve yet to be convinced, but send them my way if you like). Now, specifically regarding SARScov2, I could go along with the notion that the so-called “virus” has not being “isolated”, but to say, de facto, that “viruses don’t exist” or, “this isn’t a virus”, or it wasn’t the result of “gain of function”, well, I guess this past year, and all that sickness and death, was simply a bad dream? And I must say, regarding “germ theory”, if I had to choose between Pasteur and BeChamp, I’d pick BeChamp all day. But the notion that “viruses don’t exist at all” or, “virology is a ‘fraudulent science’” (clearly none of us commenting here, in such a far out way, work in the field of virology)… Well, again, I’m not so sure about alllllllllllllll of that.

                • Good points.

                  • Good job pointing out ambiguities and contradictions. I’ve reviewed a lot of ‘viruses’ don’t exist material, then the ‘oh but there are ‘’ exosomes’’, oka-ay but… And I am led to believe ‘viruses’ are not ‘alive,’ they are just code…, oka-ay but… So, the only thing I can do is turn away from this and try to sharpen my understanding of microbiology in ways I can understand. FYI I’m finding this book eminently readable, theoretically consistent with what presumably, we ‘know’: https://www.amazon.com/The-Human-Superorganism-audiobook/dp/B01FWKEBDY/ref=sr_1_1?crid=1S8GX2GS6L1WE&dchild=1&keywords=the+human+superorganism&qid=1622907547&sprefix=The+human+super%2Caps%2C223&sr=8-1

                      • Anybody who has European HS level grip on biology knows that viruses are dead or latent, unless they dwell in a living organisms and multiply. there

                      • Whatever the role of viruses in disease, I have to agree that “virology [and medicine in general] is largely a fraudulent science,” in the sense that it’s largely a corrupt field, driven by profit and social engineering more than by rigorous science or the desire to heal. Medical science has made many great advances, yet there’s a lot it still doesn’t understand about the human body and disease. The point about complex systems is a very good one. And scientists can fall into dogmas just as easily as cultists do. So, for myself, I reserve judgment on a lot of these questions, while continuing to gather information and staying open to revising my view based on new things I learn from official science, “alternative” sources, or my own experience.

                          • I get your points but let me push back just a tad. When you say that virology and medicine is largely a corrupt field, more after profits than health, more malevolent than scientific, I get it. My issue with this statement revolves around the word “largely” and casting a large, abstract blanket over the whole of western medicine. Let’s take surgery as one example. If one is going under the knife, choosing to do so because of a doctor’s recommendation, I doubt very much that the doctor wants to cut someone open simply for profit or some corrupt, hidden intention. I just had surgery not that long ago, it billed at $27k. I asked my Doctor what he made for each surgery? $350, before taxes. It was a two hour surgery, not including his pre and post prep. I’d say Dr. K was far from being in his profession for the money or some corrupt incentive. I’d argue that some 90% of western, modern medicine, excluding many Rx drugs (which I’ll cannonball into the pool of corruption and profit-motive with you, whole heartedly!) is not too bad at all. My mom just got a parasite she picked up in Mexico. Thank God for modern day antibiotics. They cleared her right up after two weeks of intestinal hell. A close member of my family has a rare’ish metabolic syndrome, I certainly have issues with her diagnosis, but the nurses that care for her every few months are absolutely amazing! So is her Pediatrian. I’ve been dealing with a planters wart on my foot recently, my doctor is great, and I’m pretty sure my $60 visit isn’t filling his coffers to levels of bulging excess. Did the pharmacist behind my local counter wake up today and think, “I’m going to get rich off of all these unhealthy slugs today!”? I seriously doubt it. Considering I know him quite well, and know, in fact, that he does care quite a bit about the random person he consults each day. My cousin is a virologist at Michigan State, working specifically with dog viruses. Her research is amazing, and beyond fascinating when she shares it. She and her team do great “science”, all with the motivation of understanding the similarities between K9 and human illnesses. I’d argue that my cousin and her team are far from Dr. Evil. If we want to single out big Rx or insurance companies for profit motivated corruption, I’m all in! But the Field (i.e., all the individual people within it) itself, largely corrupt and profit based, I challenge the precision of this statement, with all due respect.

                              • A pleasure to see such well thought out and respectful ‘push back.’ Would that there be more.

                                • ML Light — Your points are well taken, and I’d say your pushback is justified. I have had my share of medical problems, and have myself met caring, hardworking (overworked, in fact) doctors and nurses. Most are trying to help people and doing what they believe is the right thing. I have seen a few con artists and some who seem more interested in expensive procedures than in what’s best for the patient. I was generalizing in my remarks, so to be more precise, what I think is much too corrupt or self-interested: pharmaceutical and vaccine R&D, marketing, and sales; allocation of funds for medical research within government and universities; some (too many) peer-reviewed, published studies, tainted by conflicts of interest; most medical experts who are given access to mainstream media, many or most of whom are themselves subject to massive conflicts of interest.