Activity

this may be of interest to giza members who are attorneys, and probably not anyone else.
I was checking out the  US v Charles Lieber case.  he was essentially charged with not filling out a government form properly (failure to disclose foreign government funding).  his defense is that the omission did not result in any harm — making the case  against him look weak.  The government then added four tax offenses for failing to report income he allegedly received from Chinese.  

As I scrolled down the list of documents (to June 4) I noticed that the US had incorporated a US motion from the Theranos case (actually the Holmes case) directly into the Lieber case as an exhibit – (Motion to Disclose Communications Not Protected by Defendant’s Attorney-Client Privilege) ( basically meaning the US wants to include communications with lawyers who are acting on behalf of the corporation and not the defendant.)  anyway what surprised me is that the two cases most mentioned in the blogs are linked in motions. this is really a meaningless coincidence but if you want to follow the lieber case, here is the link
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/17235761/united-states-v-lieber/