Activity

I found this very interesting. Matthew Anderson writes concerning Critical Race Theory in USA law schools: “Critical Race Theory, along with BLM, is a pleading tool: a position taken up by an organized — or more accurately by an incited — coalition of individuals and institutions opportunistically advancing a synthetic complaint in the public forum, especially through media, universities, and government organizations. These are needed to create the impression that their argument has an historical basis and possesses moral weight. The sufficiently articulated demands can be seen as a path to both social and legal relief through remedies of financial damages and restitution, and through policy that codifies its demands and interests — despite any constitutional violations.”
His article can be found here:
http://www.dissidentprof.com/8-home/170-what-happens-when-law-schools-embrace-critical-race-theory