Yiannis Katospiti

1. The original story was in The Times – a UK newspaper that for the most part is a Conservative Party mouthpiece. So the Conservative Party is perhaps taking a stance on Facebook?

2. The fake profile created: an IT professional in his 30s. Well this is interesting information. Is there some kind of intel that says people of this description are more likely to be watching jihadist content and child porn? Or is this just pushing an existing stereotype (limited social skill IT person is into child porn and jihadism)?

3. The fact that that fake profile person befriended jihadists? Gee, I didn’t know they were that easy to find and befriend…. but perhaps the Times had other information that “helped” them choose who to befriend. You know how they often say the “perpetrator was known to the police/security services”. Does The Times have such a list?

4. The conflation of the three different “memes”: (1) fake news/hate speech/dodgy content, (2) child pornography (which I note is give the rather mild name of Public Indecency in the U.K. justice system), (3) jihadism
Why link these together? Or is it just that they want as many people as possible to read the story and therefore include as many…[Read more]

5. Finally, the most obvious one perhaps: content that most people would see as problematic is not removed by Facebook when flagged….. yet there are many reports of Facebook militantly removing “politically incorrect” content. Evidence once again for the fact that Facebook drives a particular agenda: however, this time reported in the “mainstream” news.

6. Additionally, content moderation of troubling content is absent, prompting the question: Does Facebook WANT users to see child pornography and violent jihadist content? If so, to what purpose?

7. The underlying and implicit statement of the piece is that online content should be censored – to “protect us” of course. Given how implicit it is, perhaps that is the whole intent of the Times story: to once again reinforce the message that the Internet must be curtailed and “safely managed”.

As to point N. 6, various kinds of content especially “violence porn” can be seen on all media and as many authors have pointed out is part of a decades-old psyop. Just the other day I saw a trailer for the “spy” movie “Kingsman2” that is just a constant mowing down of “enemies”.

Instagram is rapidly descending into the same gutter, and who owns Instagram? Facebook of course!

You’re looking at the wrong people. Forget violent r@pe p0rn on woman and children, that’s part of the Tavistock plan for the degradence of western civilisation. It’s not facebook’s fault, they are a tool being used by a larger program.
However.. I would like to see the entire board of directors at Facebook gets charged with aiding and abetting…[Read more]

Maybe you need your own website 🙂

And here is feedback from an anonymous employee on the type of company it is:
“I have been working at Greenberg Quinlan Rosner full-time (More than 3 years)
Pros
Biggest “pro” …. I have been sitting attempting to think of one positive and nothing, and I mean NOTHING is coming to mind.
Cons
You are signing over your soul. Expect having emotional…[Read more]

The Head of Greenberg Quinlan Rosner, worked for the Migration Policy Inst1tute.. who worked with the Demoncrats in 2008. Here is his paper, check out the wording and phrases. Just interested in spinning migration issues and how they can be used to swing elections and populations.
Here is an article showing this firm working hand in hand with…[Read more]

If anyone wants to dig.. all I have to say is.. BOSTON DYNAMICS has been sold to SOFTBANK (a japanese ‘holding company’ who’s CEO is fada for Robots.. (probably a Patlabor fan :)) Now.. I’m not worried about this.. Despite the fact that any future Robot Police Offices (think ED-209 with wheels…) will be made by these guys.. HOWEVER.. this…[Read more]

If this story is true (always have my saltshaker handy) it reflects the hive mind as Silicon Valley is transformed into Shanghai Valley (after all, where is most of the hardware made?). Let’s see just how far human creativity will last in such a hostile environment where “innovation” mostly means top-down social and mind control.

Ok.. So his education at Illonois in Molecular Biology and his PhD from Havard in Systems Biology.. and internships for computational biology.. What the heck was his job at Google?? Something to do with studying biology through big data?
Why am I worrying about Zuckerburg’s mind reading computer systems.. and Artificial Intelligence..

If this story is true, Chinese “rant-moderating” bots have become politically incorrect:
http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/world/archives/2017/08/05/2003675968

These self proclaim top guys just taking advantage of human creation, more or less like those of Flat Earth Guy, tell me the different between them. Although Flat Earth Theory is a social engineering, it was promoted by the idiots, even their promotion can’t seem have any creativity in it, same pattern, same stupidity.