Activity

It’s interesting that Crowley’s influence ( for good or ill) is, as Churton so sagely observes, highly non-linear and at times inexplicable. If we think of Gardner, Parsons, McMurtry, Wasserman et alia as lower order derivatives of the Crowleyean Hyper-set then we can’t ascribe all and every permutation to the imprecise character of the original. Churton is obviously travelling along his own path, but to expect yet another podcast interview to be a re-telling of lurid stories and speculation is making that genre redundant and boring. I read the comments on the THC Plus page and they seem a bit strident and exclusive. Even though it was just a short interview I found it to be worth my time.

It was the part of the interview where he is dismissive on remote viewing. That coupled with the complete white wash of a large part of his -Crowleys cadre of followers . For someone to go into writing 20 plus books it was rather narrow optics of the self proclaimed beast. But I do get that he was trying to stress other facets , but articulate a little better if you are self proclaimed UK’s greatest esoteric writer. We have too much crap foisted on us and are in a battle for clarity and truth. We don’t need more intellectual blurring of already muddy pool. Materialism paradigm is dying hopefully consciousness and magic get brought forward for what they are and not from intelligence agency spooks. Now I have to look up strident😲, Yeah I hope I wasn’t too much of a jerk, but the bugs. IMHO.